[Transvaginal Mesh]

Introduced in the 1990s, transvaginal mesh was intended to permanently fix pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence — conditions that typically plague older women after a hysterectomy or menopause. Pelvic prolapse occurs when a woman’s pelvic muscles weaken and the pelvic organs — including the bladder, rectum and uterus — drop into the vagina. SUI occurs when everyday activities place pressure on the bladder. To fix these conditions, a hammock-like piece of synthetic mesh is surgically implanted transvaginally, or through the vagina, to support the pelvic organs.

However, transvaginal mesh has several well-known complications such as organ perforation and erosion. Some of the less severe problems include constipation and urinary incontinence.

In 2008, the FDA issued a public health notification revealing the serious complications of transvaginal mesh, but said the occurrences were rare. Three years later, in 2011, the FDA updated its advisory to say that serious complications from vaginal mesh repair were not rare, and later ordered mesh manufacturers to conduct post-market safety studies.

Adding to the problem is the fact that this mesh — which has been successfully used to repair hernias for years — was never tested for vaginal repairs. The FDA’s fast-track approval system, called the 510(k), doesn’t require testing prior to market release as long as the product is similar to an already-approved product.

In particular, the FDA discovered several alarming facts:

  • Transvaginal mesh repairs introduce more risks than traditional non-mesh repairs.
  • There is no evidence that mesh used for repairs on the top or back wall of the vagina provide any added benefits compared with traditional surgeries without mesh.
  • Multiple Revision Surgeries Often Required to Correct Problems
  • FDA Reviews Vaginal Mesh Safety but Declines to Recall1)

Mesh removed after 3 months, Courtesy Liz Reece

1)
In September 2011, the FDA’s Obstetrics & Gynecology Devices Advisory Committee reviewed the dangers of mesh and the associated health risks. Despite pleas from consumer advocates, the 15-member panel declined to remove transvaginal mesh from the market. However, the committee did call for more stringent testing of new mesh devices and also supported reclassifying the device as Class III. This would require premarket approval to ensure the safety and effectiveness of any future devices. In January 2012, the FDA sent letters to dozens of transvaginal mesh manufacturers, requiring three-year studies to be performed on their products. The goal is to study the device’s side effects and the women’s overall quality of life. In July 2012, Johnson & Johnson stopped selling four mesh products: Gynecare TVT Secur system, Gynecare Prosima, Gynecare Prolift and Gynecare Prolift + M. C.R. Bard also pulled its Avaulta line of mesh products from the market.