차이
문서의 선택한 두 판 사이의 차이를 보여줍니다.
양쪽 이전 판이전 판다음 판 | 이전 판 | ||
med:pap_test [2016/07/11 07:30] – V_L | med:pap_test [2025/04/29 03:12] (현재) – 제거됨 V_L | ||
---|---|---|---|
줄 1: | 줄 1: | ||
- | {{tag> | ||
- | ======자궁경부암세포검사(PAP test)====== | ||
- | 세포검사라고 해서 자궁경부의 세포를 검사용 브러쉬를 이용해서 채취하여 검사하는 방법으로 약 70% 정도의 진단율을 보이는 검사이다. 하지만 비용이 저렴하고 검사가 비교적 간단하므로 보편적인 자궁암 검사 중 선별 검사로 널리 사용이 되고 있다. 하지만 100% 정확성을 보이는 정밀검사는 아니므로 결혼을 한 분인 경우는 적어도 1년에 한번 정도는 검사를 꾸준히 받는 것이 중요하다. | ||
- | |||
- | 최근의 의학적 검사기법의 발달에 근거하여 미쿡 [[http:// | ||
- | |||
- | 산부인과에 가서 자궁암 검진을 받으면 팝스메어(Pap smear)라는 검사를 하게 된다. 이 검사는 자궁 세포가 이상이 있는지 암으로 진행할 변화가 있는지를 검사하는 방법이다. 자궁세포에 이러한 변화가 있으면 이를 자궁경부이형화라고 진단한다. 다른 용어로 비정상적인 세포변화, | ||
- | |||
- | ==== 언제까지? | ||
- | 70세 이상의 경우 그이전 검사에서 3회이상 정상이었다면 검사를 종료해도 된다. | ||
- | |||
- | =====결과와 그 의미===== | ||
- | |||
- | ====ASC-US==== | ||
- | |||
- | The most common cytological abnormality in the United States (mean rate 4.7% in 2003). | ||
- | The prevalence of CIN 2/3 among women with ASC-US is 7%–12% in the United States. | ||
- | Almost half of all cases of CIN -2/ 3 are diagnosed in women with ASC-US. | ||
- | Women with a cytological result of ASC-US require additional follow-up.* | ||
- | Most high-grade disease is found in women who have minor cytologic abnormalities. | ||
- | ====ASC-H==== | ||
- | |||
- | It’s an uncommon finding (mean rate of 0.43% in 2003 in the United States). | ||
- | The risk of CIN-2/3 is higher for ASC-H than ASC-US (40% vs 15%). | ||
- | The prevalence of CIN-2/3 among women with ASC-H ranges from 26% to 68%. | ||
- | ASC-H is a designation given to specimens that show atypical squamous cells for which HSIL cannot be excluded; clinicians should consider specimens given this designation to represent equivocal HSIL. | ||
- | All women with this Pap result will require colposcopy and management according to published guidelines.* | ||
- | ====LSIL==== | ||
- | |||
- | Prevalence is moderate (mean rate of 2.6% in 2003 in the United States). | ||
- | A pooled estimate showed that 77% of women with LSIL are positive for high-risk HPV. | ||
- | Prevalence of CIN-2/3 among women with LSIL ranges from 12% to 16%. | ||
- | LSIL is a common cytology abnormality that usually represents self-limited HPV infection. | ||
- | Except in special populations, | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ====HSIL==== | ||
- | |||
- | Is relatively uncommon (mean rate of 0.7% in 2003 in the United States). | ||
- | |||
- | Prevalence varies with age: | ||
- | 0.6% in women 20–29 years old | ||
- | 0.2% in women 40–49 years old | ||
- | Prevalence of CIN 2/3 in women evaluated using a loop excision 84% to 97%. | ||
- | |||
- | * Approximately 2% of women with HISL have invasive cancer. | ||
- | More often associated with persistent infection and progression than LSIL. | ||
- | Detecting CIN-2/3 has emerged as the central purpose of screening. | ||
- | |||
- | Either colposcopy with endocervical assessment or loop electrosurgical excision is recommended, | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ====AGC-NOS==== | ||
- | |||
- | AGC is relatively uncommon (mean rate of 0.7% in 2003 in the United States). | ||
- | AGC is more common in women >40 years old. | ||
- | Recent series have reported that 3%–17% of women with AGC have invasive cancer. | ||
- | AGC represents a possible abnormality of glandular epithelium. | ||
- | These lesions are difficult to assess by Pap testing because they develop higher in the cervical canal than other lesions. | ||
- | For the same reasons, glandular lesions are more difficult to identify at colposcopy than other lesions. | ||
- | All categories of AGC require endometrial sampling in women who are >35 years old or at risk for endometrial neoplasia. | ||
- | AGC-Favor Neoplasia | ||
- | |||
- | * [[http:// | ||
- | * [[http:// | ||
- |